A Non-hydrostatic Model for Simulating Dam-Break Flow Through Various Obstacles

Komang Dharmawan; Putu Veri Swastika; G K Gandhiadi; Sri Redjeki Pudjaprasetya

doi:10.13164/mendel.2024.1.033

Komang Dharmawan Udayana University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-1386
Putu Veri Swastika Udayana University
G K Gandhiadi Udayana University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-5721
Sri Redjeki Pudjaprasetya Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-0272

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13164/mendel.2024.1.033

Keywords: Modelling and Simulation, Saint Venant, Dam-break, Contraction, Non-hydrostatic

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a mathematical model for modelling and simulation of the dam-break flow through various obstacles. The model used here is an extension of one-layer non-hydrostatic (NH-1L) model by considering varying channel width (Saint Venant). The capability of our proposed scheme to simulate free surface wave generated by dam-break flow through various obstacles is demonstrated, by performing two types of simulation with various obstacles, such as; bottom obstacle and channel wall contraction. It is shown that our numerical scheme can produce the correct surface wave profile, comparable with existing experimental data. We found that our scheme demonstrates the evolution of a negative wave displacement followed by an oscillating dispersive wave train. These well-captured dispersive phenomena, indicated both the appropriate numerical treatment of the dispersive term in our model and the performance of our model.

References

Al-Ghosoun, A., El Moc¸ayd, N., and Seaid, M. A surrogate model for efficient quantification of uncertainties in multilayer shallow water flows. Environmental Modelling & Software 144 (Oct. 2021), 105176.

Cai, S., Mao, Z., Wang, Z., Yin, M., and Karniadakis, G. E. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: a review. Acta Mech. Sin. 37, 12 (Dec. 2021), 1727–1738.

Cantero-Chinchilla, F. N., Castro-Orgaz, O., Dey, S., and Ayuso, J. L. Nonhydrostatic Dam Break Flows. I: Physical Equations and Numerical Schemes. J. Hydraul. Eng. 142, 12 (Dec. 2016), 04016068.

Cao, Z., Huang, W., Pender, G., and Liu, X. Even more destructive: cascade dam break floods: Cascade dam break floods. Journal of Flood Risk Management 7, 4, 357–373.

Dai, S., He, Y., Yang, J., Ma, Y., Jin, S., and Liang, C. Numerical study of cascading dam-break characteristics using SWEs and RANS. Water Supply 20, 1, 348–360.

Daripa, P. Higher-order boussinesq equations for two-way propagation of shallow water waves. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids 25, 6, 1008–1021.

Hu, H., Zhang, J., and Li, T. Dam-break flows: Comparison between flow-3d, MIKE 3 FM, and analytical solutions with experimental data. Applied Sciences 8, 12, 2456.

Hu, H., Zhang, J., Li, T., and Yang, J. A simplified mathematical model for the dam-breach hydrograph for three reservoir geometries following a sudden full dam break. Natural Hazards 102, 3, 1515–1540.

Kim, D.-H., and Lynett, P. J. Dispersive and Nonhydrostatic Pressure Effects at the Front of Surge. J. Hydraul. Eng. 137, 7 (July 2011), 754– 765.

Kocaman, S., G¨uzel, H., Evangelista, S., Ozmen-Cagatay, H., and Viccione, G. Experimental and numerical analysis of a dam-break flow through different contraction geometries of the channel. Water (Switzerland) 12, 4 (2020).

Kudela, J., and Matousek, R. Recent advances and applications of surrogate models for finite element method computations: a review. Soft Comput 26, 24 (Dec. 2022), 13709–13733.

Kudela, J., and Matousek, R. Combining Lipschitz and RBF Surrogate Models for Highdimensional Computationally Expensive Problems. Information Sciences 619 (Jan. 2023), 457–477. arXiv:2204.14236 [cs, math].

Li, J., Cao, Z., Pender, G., and Liu, Q. A double layer-averaged model for dam-break flows over mobile bed. Journal of Hydraulic Research 51, 5, 518–534.

Magdalena, I., Hariz, A., Farid, M., and Kusuma, M. S. B. Numerical studies using staggered finite volume for dam break flow with an obstacle through different geometries. Results in Applied Mathematics 12 (2021), 100193.

Mohapatra, P. K., and Chaudhry, M. H. Numerical solution of boussinesq equations to simulate dam-break flows. J. Hydraul. Eng. 130, 2, 156–159.

Nguyen, V. M., Phan, H. N., and Phan, T. H. Prediction of Unstable Hydrodynamic Forces on Submerged Structures under the Water Surface Using a Data-Driven Modeling Approach. Buildings 12, 10 (Oct. 2022), 1683.

Ozmen-Cagatay, H., and Kocaman, S. Dambreak flows during initial stage using SWE and RANS approaches. Journal of Hydraulic Research 48, 5, 603–611.

Pudjaprasetya, S. R., and Tjandra, S. A Hydrodynamic Model for Dispersive Waves Generated by Bottom Motion. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics 77 (2014).

Qian, H., Cao, Z., Liu, H., and Pender, G. New experimental dataset for partial dam-break floods over mobile beds. Journal of Hydraulic Research 56, 1, 124–135.

Soares-Fraz˜ao, S. Experiments of dam-break wave over a triangular bottom sill. Journal of Hydraulic Research 45 , 19–26.

Soares-Fraz˜ao, S., and Guinot, V. A second-order semi-implicit hybrid scheme for onedimensional Boussinesq-type waves in rectangular channels. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 58, 3 (Sept. 2008), 237–261.

Stelling, G., and Zijlema, M. An accurate and effcient finite-difference algorithm for nonhydrostatic free-surface flow with application to wave propagation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 23, May 2002 (2003), 1–23.

Sun, J., Li, X., Yang, Q., Tian, Y., Wang, S., and Yang, M. Hydrodynamic numerical simulations based on residual cooperative neural network. Advances in Water Resources 180 (2023), 104523.

S.V. Lund, N., Madsen, H., Mazzoleni, M., Solomatine, D., and Borup, M. Assimilating flow and level data into an urban drainage surrogate model for forecasting flows and overflows. Journal of Environmental Management 248 (Oct. 2019), 109052.

Swastika, P. V., and Pudjaprasetya, S. R. The Momentum Conserving Scheme Implementation for Simulating Dambreak Flow in a Channel with Various Contractions. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (2021), vol. 925, p. 012012.

Swastika, P. V., Pudjaprasetya, S. R., Wiryanto, L. H., and Hadiarti, R. N. A momentum-conserving scheme for flow simulation in 1D channel with obstacle and contraction. Fluids 6, 1 (2021), 26.

Tang, S., Feng, X., Wu, W., and Xu, H. Physics-informed neural networks combined with polynomial interpolation to solve nonlinear partial differential equations. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 132 (2023), 48–62.

Tarwidi, D., Pudjaprasetya, S. R., and Tjandra, S. S. A Non-Hydrostatic Model for Simulating Weakly Dispersive Landslide- Generated Waves. Water 15, 4 (Feb. 2023), 652.

Wang, J., Liang, D., Zhang, J., and Xiao, Y. Comparison between shallow water and boussinesq models for predicting cascading dam-break flows. Natural Hazards 83, 1, 327–343.

Zhang, Y., and Lin, P. An improved SWE model for simulation of dam-break flows. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management 169, 6, 260–274.